|
|
|
Decommissioning Index
|
|
Next Section
|
Introduction
Decommissioning is the process by which options for the physical removal
and disposal of structures at the end of their working life are assessed; a
plan of action is formulated by the operator, approved by government and
then implemented. The overall timescale for this is several years, as it
needs to take into account many diverse factors and involves many
organisations.
Fig: Schematic showing a typical fixed steel platform
Please click on the image below to see a larger view:

In the UK, there are approximately 470 offshore oil and gas installations.
These are mainly located in the Northern, Central and Southern North Sea, as
well as in the waters west of Shetland and in the Irish Sea. The Department
of Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform (BERR) produces several
overview maps detailing the infrastructure present on the UKCS.
Fig: Overview map showing the oil and gas fields and
pipelines on the UKCS. Source: Wood Mackenzie

At present, where a structure cannot merely be floated away, the best
solution is normally to cut the structure into smaller more manageable
sections, lift them onto barges and subsequently bring them back to shore
for re-use, re-cycling or disposal. Often this constitutes a dangerous,
lengthy, costly and weather sensitive procedure.
There are four discrete stages involved in a decommissioning project:
1. The available options for decommissioning are developed, assessed and
selected, balancing environmental factors, cost, technical feasibility,
health and safety, and public acceptability factors;
2. The operator applies to the Government to finish production having proved
the reservoir is no longer viable. The government will then grant a
“cessation of production” (COP) permit. At this stage the wells will be
securely plugged deep below the surface;
3. The operator gains government approval to proceed with its recommended
decommissioning option and offshore operations begin to remove all or parts
of he structure to shore;
4. Sections are removed to shore and then re-used, recycled or disposed of.
Historical context
Most of the global oil and gas industry’s experiences of decommissioning
offshore infrastructure comes from the US Gulf of Mexico, where around 1,000
small structures have been removed. However the relatively shallow (30 - 50
m) water depths, and weather conditions differ greatly from the northern
North Sea, where weather conditions are harsher and water depths can reach
up to 200 m.
The first platform to be decommissioned in the North Sea was in 1978. Since
then about 30 structures have been removed or approved for removal. Nearly
half of these are floating or sub-sea structures and all removals to-date
have been to a clean sea-bed. However, approval has recently been given to
the “North
West Hutton” and “Frigg”
structures, which under OSPAR 98/3 qualify for partial removal, leaving a
steel stump and the concrete sub-structure respectively. The decommissioning
issue therefore will continue with the effective management of this legacy.
In the early 1990s, when the oil price dipped below $10/barrel, the prospect
of a significant increase in decommissioning activity fired predictions of
over 50 installations and costs of £1.5 billion in the ten years to 2005.
This led to much speculation that a lucrative new business would result.
However, studies have since shown that the economic activity from extending
oil and gas developments is far more beneficial. Assisted by the rise in oil
prices and renewed interest in the UKCS, this has been the predominant
driver for investment in recent years. decommissioning activity levels have
turned out to be less than a third of those predicted and some field lives
have been extended beyond 15 years. This also illustrates the uncertain
nature of planning for contract service capacity into the decommissioning
market.
In 1995, the decision to dispose of the
Brent Spar was reversed by the actions of Greenpeace and the subsequent
public interest that was roused. International governmental policies were
significantly adjusted. The legislative requirements of today have been
shaped by the debates which ensued. |
Decommissioning Index
|
|
Next Section
|
|